Friday, June 22, 2012
Upside of cautious economy: Lower gas prices
Tuesday, May 29, 2012
Vacations, re-defined (or just re-labeled)
Monday, February 27, 2012
About two-thirds expect a tax refund, and more folks intend to "save" it
Tuesday, February 7, 2012
More warnings of rising fuel prices
Sunday, January 29, 2012
Generational Economics: New Age Seniors
Tuesday, June 7, 2011
UPDATE: Opportunities hiding within state budget cuts
Thursday, June 2, 2011
One third of consumers say vacation plans impacted by finances, fuel prices
Monday, May 23, 2011
UPDATE: Gas pains won't prohibit vacation
Monday, March 14, 2011
UPDATE: Another take on the effects of higher gas prices
The Fuel Economy has been a frequent subject of the Elm Street Economics consumer trends blog (click here to see posts tagged in that group), and it is likely to remain a hot topic. This morning, Colleague Jim Hopes pointed out a story that appeared today in Advertising Age, which explains how different companies and industry categories are preparing for the possibility of higher gas prices. Click here to read the story.
Implications: This article wisely points-out that for each increase in the price of gasoline, the amount of money that remains “discretionary” in a household goes down, causing families to sort their purchase priorities differently.
Another important take-away: Both companies and consumers went through a spike in energy costs back in 2008. If fuel prices climb appreciably, there is less likely to be “price panic,” as we all have the clarity of hindsight to our advantage. That was less the case three years ago.
Mike Anderson, for the Elm Street Economics consumer trends blog. A service of The Center for Sales Strategy, Inc.
Monday, February 14, 2011
New attitudes toward generosity and gifting
My wife recently encouraged me to buy an expensive D-SLR camera, to replace one that I had irreparably damaged on a kayak trip last fall. I agreed, under the condition that she might go easy on my birthday and Christmas gifts this year (the camera would do the job).
Not long after that, I encouraged my wife to purchase a painting that she fell in love with while we were on vacation. She consented, under the condition that the trip and the painting would be considered her holiday present.
I thought that our behavior might be unique, but within an article in Saturday’s New York Times I found evidence that we might simply be part of a growing trend… where gifting has moved toward giving someone permission to spend on a themselves, to fulfill an expensive hobby or passion. It was a fascinating story, and you can read it by clicking here.
Implications: The great recession taught us to avoid waste. The trend that his hinted at by this story takes the pressure—and the risk of potential waste—off of those who toil and stew about what the perfect gift might be for someone they love. Instead of trying to be mind-readers—knowing what the absolute perfect give might be—we are becoming facilitators… encouraging our spouse or significant other to fulfill a dream or desire (and not feel guilty about it).
Is your product or service too complex for someone to give as a gift? (Julie may have been intimidated to know what kind of lens capability, speed, storage and connectivity I would look for in a camera… and I don’t have a clue when it comes to choosing a painting or any other decorative decision.) Perhaps the solution is not to market your product or service as a gift that someone gives, but as a dream to be encouraged.
In this scenario, I can imagine a whole new range of things (aspirations) that begin to compete for the gift dollar. Travel? Higher education? Anything which, purchased for oneself, might feel selfish… but when purchased with the encouragement of a loved one, could be the most generous gift of all.
PS: It’s Valentine’s Day. Still need a great, last-minute gift idea?
[Note: For a counter trend to this posting, see the story that follows—Financial Infidelity—immediately above.]
Mike Anderson, for the Elm Street Economics consumer trends blog. A service of The Center for Sales Strategy, Inc.
Monday, February 7, 2011
Disney reaches out to kids... on arrival
An interesting story in today’s New York Times cites the company’s maternity-ward marketing efforts in suggesting it’s never too soon to approach a new prospect. Click here to see the story.
Implications: Disney knows moms will greatly influence the formative years of their children. Why not build an alliance with that influence… before channel selection and favorite characters are decided by the infant?
Ironically, in their teenage years, it will be these kids who are more likely to influence the purchase behaviors of their moms! (Mobile phones, video games, places visited, etc.)
Mike Anderson, for the Elm Street Economics consumer trends blog. A service of The Center for Sales Strategy, Inc.
Tuesday, January 18, 2011
The consumer might not be who you think
Yesterday, Advertising Age offered a story that explains one of the possible implications of that shift, explaining that more men are in control of the household’s grocery shopping chores. Click here for the full story.
Implications: It’s not enough for a company to understand who their target consumers are. They must understand, also, how their target consumer groups are changing over time. And this isn’t just about groceries and packaged goods. Who’s taking the kids to the doctor? Who’s more likely to have a commute (and thus, decide on the next vehicle the household will purchase and the gas station/convenience store/coffee shop to stop at)? Who’s more likely to purchase business apparel, and who’s more likely to plan the next family vacation? Who will balance the checkbook and pay the household’s bills?
Who will drive the decision about the product or service you sell?
Mike Anderson
Thursday, December 23, 2010
A new twist on "Experiential Philanthropy?"
In this week’s Springwise.com newsletter, I saw what might be another example of this hands-on contact with worthwhile causes: Tours of London… conducted by the homeless. Click here to see the complete article.
Implications: Move over, tourist attractions. People’s move toward authenticity in response to the recent recession could have an impact on destinations from Big Ben to Mickey Mouse.
Consumers are increasingly in touch with reality.
Are you?
Can you contribute to the realism consumers are increasingly after?
Mike Anderson
Monday, December 20, 2010
My opinion: A smart use of email marketing
Today, I received a very simple email from GoGo, with “Receipt” in the subject line of the message. It showed a table like this:
$12.95 for In-flight Internet Service
-12.95 for promotional discount
0.00 Sales Tax
-------------------------------------
$0.00 Total Cost (Happy Holidays!)
Implications: This was a smart way for GoGo to get me (and thousands of others, I will assume) to try in-flight Wi-Fi. Some people will pay to use the service in the future, some people will not. But I loved the way GoGo didn’t just give me value. They reminded me that they gave me value! (No harm in that, is there!?)
Next time I need to get some work done when I'm in the air, will I remember how easy logging-on to the plane's Wi-Fi system was? Absolutely.
Mike Anderson
Thursday, December 9, 2010
I wonder if this just-in-time marketing idea will fly
Near select gates, there are designated seating areas that are equipped with i-Pad-powered menus. You place an order, and a participating restaurant will deliver the food to your gate within ten minutes. (No more walking away, and risking the loss of your upgrade!) Click here to see the story.
Implications: Yet another example of companies responding to time-sensitive consumers, and exploiting the capabilities of new technology.
Mike Anderson
Tuesday, November 23, 2010
For Gen Y, perhaps the vehicle they own won't be "automatic"
Implications: The more things change, the more things change. Gen Y could be a transitional cohort for whom vehicle ownership is not to be “taken for granted.” Whether out of environmentalism, economics, both, or “other,” it would appear that an increasing number of Millennial consumers are rethinking whether vehicle ownership is an absolute need, or just a want… which can be satisfied through other means.
- It might be smart for manufacturers to start talking about freedom and flexibility (of time, travel, scheduling, etc.), rather than just horsepower and style. How does this pitch sound coming from a dealership?
- Is there room in the market for a vehicle that is “situational?” (A car that one does not drive everywhere, but which is affordable enough to own even though it might be used only few times per month?)
Mike Anderson
Wednesday, September 8, 2010
Air fares might seem less fair
Implications: Every product has a tipping point, at which the price takes consumers out of the market. It will be interesting to see if that point is acknowledged first by the airlines, or their passengers. We should know next spring and summer, as the tourism season resumes.
It is not so much the cost of a ticket that matters at this moment... but the cost of a ticket in contrast to their pricing in the depths of the recession, which was not all that long ago. I haven't heard too much about various baggage fees and pillow prices among business travelers... but I've heard a few "non-frequent vacation flyers" that were shocked by the hidden costs of hitting the skies. If that goes on too long (the surprise, I mean), I have to guess people will find alternatives that are closer to home. What do you think?
Mike Anderson
Thursday, September 2, 2010
UPDATE: Another oil rig explosion in the Gulf
Implications: On more than a few occasions, I’ve written about the likelihood of this summer’s (first) Gulf oil spill to elevate environmental awareness or action among consumers… and the inevitable scrutiny the oil industry will face, in terms of safety policies and procedures.
There are few details about what happened in this morning’s explosion. But it will certainly amplify sensitivity to the issues mentioned above... among consumers, as well as folks who are campaigning for elected office right now.
Stay tuned...
Mike Anderson
Tuesday, August 31, 2010
Getting away makes a comeback
Implications: Whether by cutting the number of attractions, reducing the length of a trip, or by downgrading the hotel a notch or two, consumers are finding ways to get away. In a sense, the consumer seems to be re-considering what’s important about a vacation (what are the essential experiences/outcomes), just as they are re-evaluating many of the other purchases they make. For some, this right-sizing might mean going from foreign to domestic, from a cruise of five days rather than seven (or 3 instead of 5), or from an extravagant adventure to an interesting voyage.
I recently discovered a new canoe shop a few miles from my home, which offers complete outfitting services, including a shuttle to-and-from the beginning or end of your canoeing expedition. They promote the trip as a “day-cation” (a now-popular term for anything that can be used as an alternative to a multi-day vacation).
If your company serves food, fun, or even an hours-long escape… you should consider (and promote) yourself an economic alternative for folks who want fun… and frugality.
Mike Anderson
Thursday, August 5, 2010
Consumer research leads to creative, timely, topical (literally) customer service
Implications: Often, innovation is less a matter of coming up with something creative, and more a matter of paying attention.
Mike Anderson