Target: Showrooming

Observation:   About a month ago, I published a post on the practice of Showrooming, where consumers shop at a bricks-and-mortar store but then make the purchase online (see “Showrooming,” March 3).

This morning, friend and colleague Matt Sunshine shared an article from the Harvard Business Review blog that explains the position that retailer Target is taking on the practice.  Click here to see that story.

Implications:   The HBR blog post is very good… but I’m thinking the comments section that follow the story are even better, as consumers and business people alike suggest ways that Target might combat online competitors who sell for less (due to lower overhead). 

One suggestion that wasn’t made (until we made it) is blurring the line between a bricks-and-mortar and their online counterpart.  Why not have a set of business card-sized instructions—along with a QR code—that blatantly engages the consumer on the showrooming phenomenon:

“If you need some time to think it over, and you’re considering doing a little online research, please start your search with OurStore.com.  When you enter this promotional code, you’ll get (discount, gift with purchase, free shipping, other incentive).” 

The promotional or QR code would help the company track where the product engagement began, and help them develop an even better bricks-and-mouse relationship.  Versions of the card (or code) could be handed-out by store salespeople, too… so that if the seller is helping drive online sales, they could be rewarded with cash or redeemable points of some kind.  As a retailer, Target should not care whether the purchase is made in-store or online… only that it is made with Target.

Could “showrooming” be impacting your business?  In what ways could you exploit the practice?  (Exploiting can be much more profitable than complaining.) 

Mike Anderson, for the Elm Street Economics consumer trends blog. A service of The Center for Sales Strategy, Inc.

Showrooming strikes again. But this time, Target strikes back.

Observation:  Target has decided to stop selling Kindle e-readers, according to a story from USA Today.  The article suggests that part of the reason might be what is called showrooming; when people take a hands-on look at a product in store, but then go online (either at home or from their phone) to buy the item at a cheaper price from an Internet vendor.  The story indicates that another motive might be the Apple mini-stores that are scheduled for launch in a number of Target locations (Apple’s iPad would be considered a direct competitor to Amazon’s Kindle).   Click here to see the story.

Implications:   One way to beat “showrooming” is to offer a product enhancement, service, or sales experience that online vendors can’t deliver.  It seems to me that Target has decided to do just that… but just not with Kindles.

[To see our prior stories on Showrooming, click here.]

Mike Anderson, for the Elm Street Economics consumer trends blog. A service of The Center for Sales Strategy, Inc.

UPDATE: Do consumers prefer online or in-store?

Observation:  A Research Brief story this morning asserts that consumers prefer online over in-store shopping.  Click here to see it.

Implications:   I fear that the data cited in the RB story does not go far enough; or perhaps it gives a right answer to the wrong question.  As I’ve been discussing in recent posts, the consumer does not necessarily want to choose between online or in-store.  They want multiple channels available to them, and they want to use the channel that suits them best at any given moment.  If the purchase is a no-brainer, they want to get it done fast.  If the item is one of complexity, they want to hold the product in their hand, and perhaps talk to someone knowledgeable about that product.

Blanket statements can get you into trouble.  Consumers purchase preference are likely to depend on the personality of the buyer, the personality of the product, and the circumstances which bring the two together.

[For more on this matter, see “Target:  Showrooming” from 4/5/12, or “Showrooming” from 3/2/12.]

Mike Anderson, for the Elm Street Economics consumer trends blog. A service of The Center for Sales Strategy, Inc.

Abandoning the in-store shopping cart: Smartphones intercepting retail purchases

Observation:  Fifty-three percent of mobile commerce users say they have halted an in-store purchase because of an offer or information they found online, while in the store.  That’s according to research from the Internet Advertising Bureau as published today at MobileCommerceDaily.com.   Among mobile device owners, 73% have used their smartphone in-store.  Click here to see the full story.

Implications:   We’ve written about “Showrooming” in this space before (see the series by clicking here), but it seems new data is constantly arriving to illustrate just how pervasive the practice might be.

If you have a physical location—and I’ve suggested this before—wouldn’t it be smart to have a strategy where small business-card-sized brochures could be placed near the price on each shelf, containing the URL to your store’s website (and perhaps an offer that would incentivize the use of your site)?  If consumers are going to take the shopping experience online, at least they stand a better chance of continuing to do that shopping with you.  

[Note:  Thanks to friend and colleague Matt Sunshine for passing along the MobileCommerceDaily.com story along!]

Mike Anderson, for the Elm Street Economics consumer trends blog. A service of The Center for Sales Strategy, Inc.

Showrooming: A name for the consumer’s practice of shopping in-store and then buying online

Observation:   A study from NPD was summarized in today’s Marketing Daily, and focuses on the consumer’s new tendency to shop in a variety of channels (small retail, big-box, department and warehouse stores), and then buy the item online.   Click here to see the story.

Implications:   This is a genie that’s going to be hard to put back in the bottle.  So the question becomes, what can you do about it?

Is there any incentive you can offer that encourages the consumer to buy “right then and there?”  Why not offer little notecards or notepads and pencils to consumers who might want to write down details of the product on your shelf… and make sure those note-taking tools have an incentive to check your site first?  (And your URL, of course.)

This all sounds very simple, doesn’t it?  And yet, not too long ago, my wife and I were shopping for a new set of appliances.  I wanted to get the dimensions for the microwave we were planning to install (I was working on the cabinetry), so I ran to our nearest Best Buy to check it out.  When I was going to shoot the price/information tag with my cell phone camera, the department manager came and ripped it out of the display and scolded, “You can’t do that!  It’s not allowed.”  So I went home, got online and checked the details at a competitor’s website (which I should thought to do in the first place).  We ended up buying at the competitor’s store (not just the microwave, but the whole kitchen suite).   Instead of preventing me from getting product and price information, the behavior of the Best Buy associate had the effect of sending me directly into the arms of a competitor.

People will go online for product and price information.  Instead of trying to block it, why not harness that power, and make sure they hit your site first?

Mike Anderson, for the Elm Street Economics consumer trends blog. A service of The Center for Sales Strategy, Inc.